Word abonnee en neem Beursduivel Premium
Rode planeet als pijlen grid met hoorntjes Beursduivel

Koffiekamer Terug naar discussie overzicht

Zink

41 Posts
Pagina: 1 2 3 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. [verwijderd] 11 mei 2006 19:02
    Uit het silverstockreport van Jason Hommel:

    60% in 60 days! That's about what Zinc just did, from about $1 to about $1.60/lb.! ($1.57 on May 9th).

    You can find historical charts for zinc prices at kitco.com or kitcometals.com.
    see: www.kitcometals.com/charts/zinc_histo...

    On Jan. 5th, I wrote "Silver Stock Picks for 2006", and included Metalling Mining, MMGG, a zinc stock, when it was just under $1/share. Today, it hit $3.85/share, up 285%! My subscribers are, of course, thrilled!

    Sometimes, to multiply your money 1000%, it's easier to take 100% profits every four months, and put it into new deals that will increase by 100%, but other times, it's wiser to stick with a winning trade and ride it up ten fold! Last week, I foolishly sold a few shares of MMGG at $2.50 to "lock in some short term profits", even as zinc prices rose 60% in 60 days, and the stock of MMGG was about flat during that time.

    I'm significantly more bullish on MMGG today, than I was at the start of the year, for several reasons. First, my understanding of the zinc market has significantly increased. Second, I'm aware of other comparables. Third, we have price movement! 60% in 60 days!

    Like copper, zinc is tight. World supplies of zinc are down to about 13 days, and some estimate that by this fall, the world will run out of zinc. Look at the kitco charts of declining inventories. From
    www.kitcometals.com/charts/zinc_histo...

    Of course, we won't run out of zinc. Instead, prices will rise until they choke off demand before we would run out this fall. The question is, how high will zinc prices have to rise before demand is reduced? That's an interesting question, that I tried to think about in my Jan 28th email, where I wrote:

    So, what price may zinc rise to? Will zinc rise from $1.04/pound today to $1.50/pound next year? Or are we talking much higher here?
    Here’s my thinking: I believe it’s possible for zinc prices to increase well beyond $2/pound--even up to $3.50/pound. Here’s why & what that will mean:

    Zinc is a minor ingredient in galvanized steel (3% by weight on average), used to prevent rust, and is absolutely necessary in many, or most applications. Absolutely necessary. And a minor cost. Let those two concepts sink in: necessary & cheap.

    It’s like silver, or uranium. Silver is used in tiny quantities in industrial applications in electronics because silver is the greatest conductor of electricity, and thus, absolutely necessary! Furthermore, a significant rise in silver’s price will not reduce demand, because the end product is so very much more expensive than the silver used. And uranium is absolutely necessary to fuel a multi billion dollar nuclear reactor, and those people who run it will buy all the needed uranium, regardless of cost.

    Here’s an analogy. Steel is somewhat like a cookie recipe. It may cost $10 to make a batch of cookies. But one vital ingredient may cost $.20, such as the salt, or baking soda, which is like the zinc. Who cares if the price of that tiny, but vital, ingredient rises 10 fold, to $2--you are still going to use it to make the batch of cookies. But cookies are not as necessary as steel!

    Likewise, regardless of the price of zinc, it will be used to make stainless steel that does not rust that is needed for things like cars, kitchen knives, and who knows what else.

    Think about this: the world could sustain oil prices going from $10/barrel to $70/barrel. Hey, the inflation adjusted high of $43/barrel from 1980 is a whopping $240/barrel! And oil is the largest commodity there is in terms of its cost. For every $100 spent on commodities, probably $35 is spent on oil. Surely, the wheels of the world economy will not fall apart if tiny little zinc rises ten fold from the low of $.35 to $3.50/pound.

    And if oil can rise nearly 20 fold, zinc can rise 40 fold, but let’s not go there.

    Here’s another key point: Several other minerals needed in steel have risen about ten fold already, such as molybdenum and cobalt. I know of only two other commodities that have risen as much, selenium and iridium. So, 2 out of those 4 are used in steel. Pause, and let that sink in.

    Zinc is clearly headed up next, due to China’s increasing demand for steel—and this all helps to explain the parabolic price curve in zinc that we are now witnessing.

    And what if investors add to the demand, and continue to buy zinc futures contracts in this thin market with greater and greater force?

    www.kitcometals.com/ is an invaluable source of news on the metals markets, as they provide links to news sources all over the world. From my reading there, I've discovered that we are not in a "fund-driven bubble" in commodities, as so many of the poorer quality news sources seem to be saying.

    Further, a true "inflation adjusted" high price for zinc might be about $2.15/lb. as Bill Murray observed in his recent article on Commodities: See:
    www.silverminers.com/publications/sho...

    From my research, zinc prices are set to rise for the next 2-3 years, (two to three years!), because supply is not expanding fast enough to meet demand from China, and it will take that long to bring on enough new zinc mines to offset the zinc mines that will be closing during this time period! The details of major zinc mines are outlined in the President's Letter to Metalline Mining Company Shareholders, Monday May 1
    biz.yahoo.com/bw/060501/2006050100555...

    Inco, Falconbridge, and Teck Cominco, all major zinc miners, are all involved in a multi billion dollar acquisition dance, probably because somebody wants to try to get major control of the zinc market before things get even better for zinc--over the next two to three years!

    Now, I've studied the silver zinc explorers for a few years, due to my interest in silver. MMGG is the biggest, highest grade, most feasible zinc play there is, even at today's higher stock prices. Most others are smaller, or in higher risk countries, or don't have costs as low. MMGG is the lowest cost, with the highest grade, set to produce more zinc than all others of which I know.

    Here's an apt comparison. EuroZinc Mining Corp. (EZM) is aiming to produce 200 million pounds of zinc per year. MMGG is aiming to produce just under 400 million pounds of zinc per year.

    EuroZinc has a market cap of $1.6 Billion dollars, or $1600 million.

    MMGG has a market cap of $192 million. (50 million shares at $3.85)

    EuroZinc already rose in price much more than ten times since mid 2003.

    If MMGG merely matches the market cap, including a $300 million dilution at $10/share (to finance the mine construction) that will be an additional 45 million more shares (to allow for a half warrant), and MMGG will rise to $16.84/share. (That's $1600 million / 95 million shares = $16.84.) But MMGG may well exceed that, because if zinc prices are slightly above a modest $2/lb., MMGG could be earning about $800 million per year, which, at a P/E of 10, could point to a market cap of $8 billion! If that market cap is reached, at 95 million shares, that's $84/share for MMGG!

    A few people have asked me about MMGG's recent financing at $.80/share, that was announced in the President's letter. It certainly seems too low. But the financing was open for 9 months, and during that time, nobody wanted to invest in MMGG. Part of the problem was that MMGG
  2. [verwijderd] 11 mei 2006 19:03
    vervolg:

    had run out of money from spending $8 million on drilling, and proving up their zinc resources. The other problem was that investors who had participated in the prior financing were selling, to get in on the new financing, which drove the stock down. Finally, in January, as zinc prices had advanced from $.50 to $1/lb., the recent financing quickly closed as I, and a few others, began to give MMGG some publicity. I bought the stock then, primarily because the stock was "cheap" and a bit of a laggard compared to its peers. At the time, we did not have such price action in zinc, such as the 60% gain in the last 60 days! In January, zinc prices were below $1/pound, and so today, MMGG is a much better opportunity, because it is now clear that the long wait is about over.

    Now, there are a few other zinc stocks, if you don't want to jump on the MMGG train.

    Try looking up and researching the following:
    SIL (Apex Silver) --high market cap, hedged with about a $700 million hedging loss, & in risky Bolivia.
    EZM (Euro Zinc) --high market cap
    YZC.V (Yukon Zinc) --developing story, but recently hedged.
    CZN.TO CZICF.PK (CANADIAN ZINC) --nearly full infrastructure, underground mine, to produce about 1/4 the zinc of MMGG/year.
    ABI.V ABMBF.PK (Abcourt Mines) (I own shares of Abcourt)
    FAN.TO FRLLF.PK (FARALLON RESOURCES) --low grade, multi-mineral sulfides.
    HDA.V (HUSIF.PK) (HULDRA SILVER) --very tiny market cap
    SBB.V SBBFF.PK (SABINA SILVER CORP) --relatively low grade
    RDV.TO RDFVF.PK (REDCORP VENTURE) --small market cap, lower grade

    I suppose I ought to remind you about the very high grade silver that MMGG has.

    Sierra Mojada is a Silver District!
    "The Sierra Mojada Property has produced in excess of 10 million tons of high-grade ore that graded in excess of 30% lead, 20% zinc, 1% copper and 1 kg (31 ounces) silver per ton that was shipped directly to the smelter. The district has never had a mill to concentrate ore. All of the mining was done selectively for ore of sufficient grade to direct ship; mill grade ore was left unmined."
    (That's 310 million ounces of silver. Who knows how much silver is left?) That's the question with an explorer.

    MMGG is set to spend some of the money in the recent financing proving up their silver and copper areas. Also, they will be advancing a feasibility study for their zinc. In the meantime, Merling Bingham, president of MMGG has said he has no need to raise any money until feasibility is completed. Resources move to "reserves" upon completion of a feasibility study.

    I regret to say that I've fallen seriously behind in responding to all my email, as I receive over 100 questions per day, on average. Please keep the email coming. I read it all, and I find it invaluable in determinging the concerns of my readers.

    I own shares of MMGG, and Abcourt, and neither company has paid me to write this article.

    Sincerely,

    Jason Hommel
  3. faites-vos-jeux 11 mei 2006 22:56
    zink? in Duitsland is er enorm veel keus aan turbo's bijv. op de Duitse versie van ABNAMROmarkets; op de site van de Stuttgart boerse is een goede zoekfunctie (onder knock-outs kijken; ook veel Commerzbank speeders op alles en nog wat)
  4. [verwijderd] 11 mei 2006 23:08
    quote:

    faitesvosjeux schreef:

    zink? in Duitsland is er enorm veel keus aan turbo's bijv. op de Duitse versie van ABNAMROmarkets; op de site van de Stuttgart boerse is een goede zoekfunctie (onder knock-outs kijken; ook veel Commerzbank speeders op alles en nog wat)
    Is dat via SNS mogelijk?
  5. faites-vos-jeux 11 mei 2006 23:12
    moet kunnen; ze zullen misschien liever op Frankfurt handelen; toch een beetje de hoofdbeurs, maar dat maakt niet uit; wat je op de website van Stuttgart ziet kan je ook allemaal in Frankfurt krijgen
  6. [verwijderd] 11 mei 2006 23:20
    quote:

    faitesvosjeux schreef:

    moet kunnen; ze zullen misschien liever op Frankfurt handelen; toch een beetje de hoofdbeurs, maar dat maakt niet uit; wat je op de website van Stuttgart ziet kan je ook allemaal in Frankfurt krijgen
    Kun je een link geven?
  7. faites-vos-jeux 12 mei 2006 00:06
    UBS heden:

    The weight of new money entering the metals sector is unprecedented and shows no sighs of slowing with the evidence of this showing up in yet more broad based strength across the base metals sector. Copper yesterday closed above $8,000/t for the first time ever; aluminium traded above $3,000/t for the first time since June 1988 and there were new highs for the other metals. A sharp widening in nearby tightness and larger backwardations was noted pointing to short covering as an important driver. With the buying frenzy unabated can it be too long before we see copper at $10,000/t, aluminium at $3,500/t, zinc at $4,000/t and nickel at $25,000/t? It would be churlish to leave lead and tin out of our thoughts so, why not lead at $1,500/t and tin at $10,000/t? This morning’s LME inventory data was mostly supportive but continued gains in stocks of lead and aluminium raise more questions than answers.
    Meanwhile, this week’s reports that China plans to build strategic mineral reserves and resources is being interpreted (wrongly in our view) as bullish despite the fact that an official from the Ministry of Land and Resources has confirmed that China has no plans to enter the market and build physical metal stocks (see below). It is abundantly clear that base metals have detached from fundamental drivers and are vulnerable to a sudden and unforecastable change in sentiment. We believe metal prices will firm in the near term but risks have clearly increased. Our advice is to trade these markets from the long side but look to rallies to take some profits. A correction is long overdue and will provide better opportunities to re-establish/add to long positions.
  8. [verwijderd] 28 mei 2006 18:39
    Zinc consumers fret over tight supply

    Fri May 26, 2006 7:46 AM ET
    LONDON, May 26, (Reuters) - The steel industry is closely monitoring moves in zinc prices as worries intensify about a possible market deficit, a U.S. steel maker said on Friday.

    "At some time in the beginning of 2007, zinc supply is going to be so tight and the price will be astronomical and some people will not get their zinc," Douglas Brooks, a manager at Nucor Corp (NUE.N: Quote, Profile, Research), told Reuters at Metal Bulletin's zinc seminar in London.

    Brooks said he was much more worried about how to obtain zinc, rather than its price.

    The moment price became a problem, orders would drop off and the market would stabilise automatically.

    "Eventually, zinc will be so expensive that people drop out, and then there will suddenly be plenty of zinc around," he said.

    But before that happened, the price could go well beyond $5,500 a tonne.

    Such levels would not be sustainable, but he still expected the price to stay around $1,500 a tonne.

    "We will never see zinc at $800-$900 again," he said.

    yahoo.reuters.com/stocks/QuoteCompany...

  9. [verwijderd] 1 juni 2006 19:34
    Gelinkt via resourceinvestor.com

    Ik ben zoals bekend erg enthousiast over commodities in z'n algemeenheid. Als ik kijk waar het grootste gedeelte van mijn porto uit bestaat dan is dat: olie, teerzand, gas, goud, zilver en uranium. Ik zit ook in zink, maar dan als bijproduct van (junior) goud/zilver mijnen. Het aandeel is relatief klein. Onderstaand genoemde aandeel heb ik niet.

    Worldwide Zinc Crisis: How to Play it
    by Tom Dyson
    Contributor, Daily Wealth
    May 31, 2006

    The world is out of zinc...

    I’m not joking. All industrial metals are scarce right now, but none are as scarce as zinc. There simply isn’t any available.

    I learned this yesterday on the golf course. Chris Hancock specializes in Asia. He is the author of a publication called the Asia Strategy Report. We were paired together in a corporate golf outing. While contemplating my approach shot to the sixteenth green, Chris started talking about zinc…

    Kohler Inc. is a huge manufacturing conglomerate, best known for making bathroom fittings like sinks, latrines and faucets. They coat their products with zinc to stop corrosion.

    “I was just in Hong Kong,” Chris told me, “and while I was there, I met up with a friend of mine who’s the manager of several Kohler plants in China. He told me they’re having trouble with zinc… they can’t find it anywhere.”

    Chris continued: “At first I didn’t pay much attention. But then at dinner that night, I sat next to a guy from my MBA class. He’s an investment banker with UBS Warburg. He says all the traders at Warburg are buying zinc like crazy and that the zinc price is about to run. But get this...

    On the plane back from Shanghai, we start chatting to the lady in the seat next to us. It turns out she manages a plant in Chicago for one of the large office supply retailers. She said she’d been in China visiting factories. We told her we had been doing the same thing. We asked her how her trip went - if she’d had any problems sourcing materials for her plant – and she told us she did. She couldn’t get hold of any zinc!”

    Last week I was at Merrill Lynch’s annual mining and metal conference, listening to CEOs pitch their companies to a room full of big money investors. I saw presentations by more than fifty companies. One company stood way out above the competition: Teck Cominco [Toronto: TEK.MVA]

    Teck Cominco just happens to be the largest producer of zinc in the world!

    Every cent the zinc price rises, Teck earns an extra ten million dollars in after-tax annual earnings. Right now zinc sells for $1.50/lb. So if zinc reaches $2.00/lb, that’s an extra $500 million for Teck’s shareholders each year.

    There’s another reason to own Teck Cominco. They also mine coal, gold, lead, molybdenum and copper. They produce crude oil from their operation in the Alberta tar sands and hydroelectric power from a dam in British Columbia. They may soon be a major producer of nickel too if their bid for Inco is successful. Said another way:

    Teck Cominco is a great way to play the bull market in general commodities.

    Of course, Teck Cominco isn’t the only diversified resource stock you can choose from. The thing is - as the CEO showed in his presentation - Teck Cominco trades at roughly a 40% discount to the other giant diversified mining companies like BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto, and Anglo American when you compare EBITDA against enterprise value.

    So not only is Teck Cominco a cheap way to buy a basket of commodities, there’s a worldwide zinc crisis and Teck Cominco is the largest producer on the planet.

    www.financialsense.com/editorials/sju...
  10. faites-vos-jeux 1 juni 2006 23:11
    maar wel altijd goed erop bedacht te zijn dat beurzen soms iets anders doen dan men verwacht:

    01-06 Grondstofprijzen zullen instorten

    AMSTERDAM (redactie Beursonline) –De grondstoffenprijs 'zeepbel' zal in het vierde kwartaal van dit jaar ploffen. De hogere rente zal de economische groei drukken en een rem op de vraag naar olie, koper en andere ruwe materialen zetten. Dat schrijft de Franse bank Societe Generale.

    De prijzen zijn in de afgelopen maanden wellicht gepiekt, maar zij kunnen in het komende kwartaal verder omhoog vanwege de speculatie over de toevoer van het aanbod en de dalende voorraden.

    "De gedachte van een zeepbel onder beleggers begint steeds meer post te vatten. Maar het kan niet eerder knappen totdat er een algemene consensus is. Wij zijn er nog niet." aldus analist Fredric Lassere.

    De grondstoffenprijzen gemeten door de Reuters/Jeffries CRB-index is voor de vierde achtereenvolgende jaar gestegen, de langste serie sinds begin jaren' 70 van de vorige eeuw. In het derde kwartaal zullen volgens de zakenbank de industriële metalen sterker stijgen dan de edelmetalen die op hun beurt beter zullen presteren dan energie.

    De index is in de week van 19 mei met 6,4% gedaald, het grootse verlies sinds 1980.

    "Wij geloven dat deze correctie nog niet het einde van de bull markt inluidt en dat de prestaties spectaculair zullen blijven tot het vierde kwartaal", aldus Lassere.

    Beleggers zijn verdeeld of de grondstoffenrally ten einde is. Stephen Roach, hoofdeconoom van Morgan Stanley verwacht dat de zeepbel kan barsten als de economische groei in China vertraagt. Grondstoffengoeroe Jim Rogers voorziet echter dat de rally aanhoudt omdat de vraag het aanbod van ruwe materialen overstijgt.

  11. [verwijderd] 3 juni 2006 12:39
    quote:

    durobinet schreef:

    Toevallig krijg ik net een aardig artikel binnen van Jason Hommel o.a. over het fenomeen hedgen. Of eigenlijk over de investering in zink, maar... enfin, lees maar.
    vr.gr. duro

    Increased Free Market Leading to Higher Zinc Prices

    Silver Stock Report
    June 2, 2006
    by Jason Hommel

    This page can be read online at:
    silverstockreport.com/email/Zinc.html

    The free market is expanding to more parts of the world, and increased trade is leading to greater prosperity for more people around the world than ever before. www.silverstockreport.com/email/Clyde...

    The free market (which I believe is best described as Biblical capitalism) is certainly being hindered by forces too numerous to mention, but including: paper money, usury, futures contracts, excessive government, corruption and ignorance among those in government, heavy taxes, trade restrictions, immigration quotas, welfare, minimum wages and other forms of price fixing, and government granted monopolies of patents. Due to all of this, I'm not under any delusion that the world will be dancing off into the sunset of economic prosperity of a true free market anytime soon. In fact, I think that the world will continue to reject some parts of the "unknown ideal" of the free market even after Jesus returns as King, because the Bible clearly mentions that there will be the occasional rebellion, even then, see Isaiah 65 and Zechariah 14.

    But one of the essential features of the free market is that prices are allowed to change; and it is the free market price that regulates supply and demand, and not government. Higher prices are supposed to both stimulate supply and reduce demand; while lower prices are supposed to reduce supply and stimulate demand. A freely changing price best suits all market participants; because we live in a changing world, and it's impossible for one person to oversee and manage everything for everyone.

    Now, I list futures contracts as a mechanism that is upsetting the free market, because futures turn things upside down. Higher prices can lead to increased investor demand; but higher prices are supposed to lower demand. This is often described as "fund buying". Higher prices can also reduce supply, if producers have hedged through futures, and locked in prices that end up being below the market price, due to inflation. Hedging can cause producers to lose money and go bankrupt in a rising price environment. (This nearly happened to gold miners Ashanti and Cambior in 1999 when the gold price quickly rose $70/oz.!) Foolish producer hedging also greatly upsets the workers, who rightly feel that they should be able to benefit from a rising market price. Worker strikes were recently affecting Industrial Penoles, who hedged zinc at about $1000/tonne, while zinc has traded as high as $3500/tonne.

    Futures contracts are "rationalized" and "justified" because they are supposed to reduce price volatility, but instead, they increase it! Futures contracts are also "rationalized" because a business in debt needs to be able to lock in prices for something that they may need to either buy or sell in the future. But, again, debt itself is contrary to how Biblical capitalism is supposed to work; as people should not be in debt. Futures markets also drain away money that could otherwise have been allocated towards investing in production, instead.

    Very wealthy traders can also use futures markets to reduce price volatility, and manipulate prices, by selling or buying far more of the commodity that may exist, and they can get away with this manipulation for years. Paper money is also a manipulation, because it allows "very wealthy traders" to exist in the first place. And when paper money is created at a governmental level (such as with the Federal Reserve), and when this is used to manipulate prices (such as with the exchange stabilization fund, or Plunge Protection Team), this is really not much different than communism itself.

    But as bad as things are; things are getting better for more people around the world, especially as communism has collapsed in Russia and China, and as trade increases. And prices are certainly changing rapidly, especially in commodities and precious metals--which is better than stagnation, manipulation, and shortages -- which are the end result of communism.

    But under communism, nobody benefits from shortages. People just have to wait in long lines, or do without. Under the current slightly more free so-called "free market" system, we can benefit from shortages, through investing, and this is our opportunity.

    A world-wide zinc shortage is looming, if not already here!

    And you must act quickly, before other investors, to benefit the most from the looming zinc shortage.

    The LME (London Metals Exchange) has 8.2 days of zinc inventory, and at current rates that these stocks are being drawn down, the LME will be out of zinc by November, 2006 -- unless zinc prices rise substantially to cut back demand, of course.

    Clearly, zinc prices must rise until industrial demand decreases, or zinc supply increases. But prices may rise a lot because zinc is primarily used in galvanized steel, and zinc is a very low cost component of galvanized steel. Zinc prices may also rise a lot because zinc supply cannot increase significantly in the next two years, as that is how long it takes to bring major new zinc mines into production. Zinc prices may also rise a lot due to the turbulent futures markets that can create both the prior downside price manipulation, in addition to a massive over-correction to the upside, along with massive price movements; both up and down, within the next two years.

    Recently, copper prices moved up 12% in one day; while bonds pay less than 6% in an entire year!

    On May 11th, precious and base metals paused from their roaring uptrend, and began to dip.

    Zinc hit a high of $1.72/lb., and quickly dipped to $1.45/lb. But zinc has already shown the greatest strength, as it climbed back up to $1.70 again earlier this week. Even today, zinc has shown the greatest gains among the base metals, and is up 4.5% to $1.60/lb.

    The annual world consumption of zinc is 10.7 million tonnes.
    Source: www.ilzsg.org/ilzsgframe.htm

    The stockpiles of zinc at the LME are rapidly declining; and stand at 240,000 tonnes.
    Source: www.kitcometals.com/charts/zinc_histo...

    10.7 M tonnes / 365 = 29,300 tonnes/day of world zinc consumption.

    240 KT / 29.3 KT = 8.2 days worth of zinc, stockpiled at the LME.

    At current draw down rates (240,000 tonnes in the past 6 months) LME stocks will be exhausted by November, 2006.

41 Posts
Pagina: 1 2 3 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Neem deel aan de discussie

Word nu gratis lid van Beursduivel.be

Al abonnee? Log in

Direct naar Forum

Zoek alfabetisch op forum

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
Forum # Topics # Posts
Aalberts 466 7.017
AB InBev 2 5.496
Abionyx Pharma 2 29
Ablynx 43 13.356
ABN AMRO 1.582 51.656
ABO-Group 1 22
Acacia Pharma 9 24.692
Accell Group 151 4.132
Accentis 2 265
Accsys Technologies 23 10.653
ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC 218 11.686
Ackermans & van Haaren 1 189
ADMA Biologics 1 34
Adomos 1 126
AdUX 2 457
Adyen 14 17.751
Aedifica 3 916
Aegon 3.258 322.839
AFC Ajax 538 7.088
Affimed NV 2 6.296
ageas 5.844 109.892
Agfa-Gevaert 14 2.050
Ahold 3.538 74.336
Air France - KLM 1.025 35.043
AIRBUS 1 12
Airspray 511 1.258
Akka Technologies 1 18
AkzoNobel 467 13.036
Alfen 16 24.843
Allfunds Group 4 1.473
Almunda Professionals (vh Novisource) 651 4.251
Alpha Pro Tech 1 17
Alphabet Inc. 1 406
Altice 106 51.198
Alumexx ((Voorheen Phelix (voorheen Inverko)) 8.486 114.822
AM 228 684
Amarin Corporation 1 133
Amerikaanse aandelen 3.837 243.210
AMG 971 133.343
AMS 3 73
Amsterdam Commodities 305 6.689
AMT Holding 199 7.047
Anavex Life Sciences Corp 2 491
Antonov 22.632 153.605
Aperam 92 14.999
Apollo Alternative Assets 1 17
Apple 5 382
Arcadis 252 8.776
Arcelor Mittal 2.033 320.709
Archos 1 1
Arcona Property Fund 1 286
arGEN-X 17 10.302
Aroundtown SA 1 219
Arrowhead Research 5 9.739
Ascencio 1 28
ASIT biotech 2 697
ASMI 4.108 39.102
ASML 1.766 107.254
ASR Nederland 21 4.486
ATAI Life Sciences 1 7
Atenor Group 1 491
Athlon Group 121 176
Atrium European Real Estate 2 199
Auplata 1 55
Avantium 32 13.672
Axsome Therapeutics 1 177
Azelis Group 1 64
Azerion 7 3.392

Macro & Bedrijfsagenda

  1. 24 februari

    1. Vastned Q4-cijfers
    2. PostNL Q4-cijfers
    3. Ifo ondernemersvertrouwen februari (Dld)
    4. Inflatie januari def. (eur)
    5. Chicago Fed index januari (VS)
    6. Retail Estates Q3-cijfers
    7. Vastned Belgium Q4-cijfers
    8. Zoom Video Communications Q4-cijfers (VS)
    9. Hims & Hers Health - Q4-cijfers
  2. 25 februari

    1. Ackermans & Van Haaren Q4-cijfers
de volitaliteit verwacht indicator betekend: Market moving event/hoge(re) volatiliteit verwacht