Word abonnee en neem Beursduivel Premium
Rode planeet als pijlen grid met hoorntjes Beursduivel

Koffiekamer Terug naar discussie overzicht

Goed nieuws, of toch niet?

122 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. Ruud100 12 september 2009 22:47
    Prachtige beeldspraak in de laatste alinea...

    Gr
    Ruud

    "Bernanke moet zijn geld-helikopter aan de grond zetten voor de benzine op is"

    Een nieuwe bubble à la Greenspan 2003 dreigt: rondklotsend geld vindt geen emplooi in de echte economie, alleen in beleggingsobjecten. Tijd om de geldpersen weer even wat zachter te zetten, argumenteert RTLZ-beurscommentator Hans de Geus.

    Bubble?
    Een bubble is op het moment van ontstaan altijd moeilijk te detecteren. Wel is zeker dat er gekke dingen gebeuren op de financiële markten: vrijwel alle categorieën beleggingen stijgen tegelijkertijd. Curieus, omdat een stijging in de éne categorie ons iets probeert te vertellen, dat de stijging van een ándere categorie juist tegenspreekt. De korte rente is daarbij naar historische niveaus gezakt.

    Voorbeeld: hogere prijzen voor obligaties wijzen op een lagere inflatieverwachting (danwel angst voor deflatie), terwijl de hoge goudprijs normaal gesproken wijst op ángst voor inflatie. Goud kan ook duurder worden omdat er paniek is in aandelen, maar ook díe stijgen.

    Bubble!
    Deze anomalieën, gecombineerd met de almaar verder dalende euribor- en libor rentes, doet een erg bang vermoeden opkomen: dat het geld niet bij de bedrijven en de gezinnen wordt gebruikt voor investeren en consumeren, maar terechtkomt bij beleggers die van gekkigheid ook niet meer weten wat ze ermee moeten, en dus alles gaan kopen wat los en vast zit. Dát is de verklaring van de "goud-obligaties paradox"

    Echte economie
    Het tragische is natuurlijk dat niemand er echt wat aan kan doen. Je kan bedrijven niet kwalijk nemen dat ze geen bankkrediet opnemen om te investeren - waarom zouden ze, als er nog zoveel machines ongebruikt staan? En waarom zouden consumenten extra gaan lenen, terwijl ze al wakker liggen van de tophypotheek die als een molensteen om de nek hangt en werkloosheid dreigt? De echte economie zit in een neerwaartse spiraal....

    Normaal
    En dat is normaal, na een krediet-gedreven consumptie extravaganza die 20 jaar duurde, voortgedreven door stijgende prijzen van activa als aandelen en huizen. We moeten terug; we ontkennen het nog, met een overheid die nog een extra hypotheek neemt in een wanhopige poging het feest nog even te rekken, terwijl de kater allang is toegeslagen. Het is normaal dat we terugmoeten alleen we accepteren het niet.

    Liquidity trap
    Extreem lage rentes, en toch bereikt het geld de economie niet - er is sprake van een klassieke liquiditeits-val.
    Dat is erg, maar deze niet erkennen, en maar doorgaan met geld uitstrooien vanuit een helikopter, is potentieel nog veel erger. Een nieuwe bubble brengt ons alleen maar verder van huis. Laten we hopen dat de centrale bankiers óók naar de prijsontwikkelingen van goud, aandelen en obligaties kijken.

    Bernanke moet niet de geschiedenis ingaan als de helikopterpiloot die door wilde vliegen tot de benzine op was...
  2. forum rang 7 ffff 12 september 2009 22:52
    De echte economie zit in een neerwaartse spiraal....

    Dat is nu juist NIET waar. De echte economie trekt weer iets aan, vanaf de bodems.

    Dat lees en hoor je in alle variaties door heel wat bedrijven en in diverse sectoren.

    Natuurlijk is men voorzichtig , maar er is in ieder geval geen sprake van een neerwaartse spiraal.

    Overigens: Al die miljoenen beleggers die voor vele miljarden de afgelopen 6 maanden kochten tegen steeds hogere prijzen zijn ook niet collectief gek.

    Peter
  3. Ruud100 12 september 2009 23:23
    quote:

    ffff schreef:

    De echte economie zit in een neerwaartse spiraal....

    Dat is nu juist NIET waar. De echte economie trekt weer iets aan, vanaf de bodems.

    Dat lees en hoor je in alle variaties door heel wat bedrijven en in diverse sectoren.

    Natuurlijk is men voorzichtig , maar er is in ieder geval geen sprake van een neerwaartse spiraal.

    Overigens: Al die miljoenen beleggers die voor vele miljarden de afgelopen 6 maanden kochten tegen steeds hogere prijzen zijn ook niet collectief gek.

    Peter
    1.
    Groei van de meeste grote economien op dit moment is minimaal.

    2.
    De overheidstekorten in de grote economien (op jaarbasis) door de enorme hoeveelheden geld die in de economie worden gepompt varieren van 6% BBP tot ruim boven de 12% BBP voor de VS.

    3. Wanneer beseft wordt dat de overheidsgelden geleend geld en dus eigenlijk gebakken lucht zijn en dit onmogelijk vol te houden is dan is er feitelijk sprake van een wereldwijde krimp die varieert van 3% tot ruim 9% BBP voor de grootste economie van de wereld.

    Daarbij ga ik er al vanuit dat een jaar geleden een overheidstekort van 3% BBP in slechte tijden als "normaal" werd beschouwd.

    Dat zijn cijfers die in de verste verte geen aanleiding geven om aan een solide herstel te denken.

    Gr
    Ruud
  4. Ruud100 13 september 2009 12:23
    www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/business/e...

    Big Spenders? They Wish
    By PETER S. GOODMAN
    Published: September 12, 2009

    Millions of Americans have lost homes, jobs and savings to the financial crisis and recession. While greed and extravagance played roles, many lived beyond their means because their paychecks shrank. This article is adapted from “Past Due: The End of Easy Money and the Renewal of the American Economy,” by Peter S. Goodman, a reporter for The New York Times. The book, to be published Tuesday by Times Books, explores the origins of the crisis and suggests ways to reinvigorate the economy.

    Dorothy Thomas landed in a shelter after piling up debt for her daughters' educations.

    ONE afternoon in November 2006, a policeman spotted an expired license plate on Dorothy Thomas’s 10-year-old Toyota Corolla as she drove through San Jose, Calif. He ordered her to pull over.

    Struggling under the weight of thousands of dollars in credit card bills, Ms. Thomas was perpetually short of cash. She had not bought a $10 auto registration sticker. The officer checked his database and recognized that she had already been ticketed once before for the same thing. He arranged to have her car towed away.

    “I got down on my knees and begged that officer,” Ms. Thomas recalled.

    As she watched her car being hauled off, she sensed that this was the beginning of a descent into a crisis from which she might not easily escape. Without money to pay the towing and storage fees, she could not extract her car from the lot, and the tab soon grew to $1,600. Without a car, she could not reach the hospital where she worked in the administrative offices, so she lost her $16-an-hour job.

    Without a paycheck, she could no longer pay the rent on her modest home. She moved to Oakland, where a friend lived in a beaten-down, rented house on a street they called Crack Avenue. By year’s end, Ms. Thomas, then 49, was occupying a bunk at a homeless shelter, searching in vain for a job in an economy plagued by unemployment.

    Across the United States a sense has taken hold that the Great Recession and the financial crisis are predominantly a result of national profligacy, as if the economy had been undone by insatiable shoppers, foolhardy home buyers and greedy investment bankers. Extravagance and recklessness certainly played crucial roles, and yet they are only part of the explanation.

    quote:

    schreef:

    Many have lived beyond their incomes simply because incomes have been outstripped by the costs of middle-class life. By the fall of 2008, most American workers were bringing home roughly the same weekly wages they had earned in 1983, after accounting for inflation.
  5. Ruud100 13 september 2009 12:28
    Danny Pang, Financier Under Investigation, Is Dead at 42

    Published: September 12, 2009

    LOS ANGELES (AP) -- Danny Pang, an Orange County financier accused by federal regulators of defrauding investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars, died Saturday. He was 42.

    Pang died at about 5 a.m. at Hoag Hospital in Newport Beach, Supervising Deputy Corner Larry Eslinger said.

    Police had been summoned to his house in a gated community at about 3:30 p.m. on Friday on a medical emergency call, and paramedics took him to the hospital, said Newport Beach police Sgt. Doug Jones.

    The cause of death was not immediately available, Esslinger said. An autopsy was scheduled for Sunday.

    Pang pleaded not guilty in July to federal charges of evading currency reporting laws. The case had been set to go to trial next week, but was delayed until next August.

    Pang, a Taiwanese immigrant, is accused of bilking investors in his $4 billion firm by falsely portraying returns as coming from investments in timeshare real estate and life insurance policies of seniors. Prosecutors said he in fact he ran a Ponzi scheme, using money raised from newer investors to pay earlier ones.
  6. Ruud100 13 september 2009 17:38
    Sunday, 13 September 2009 16:27 UK
    TUC warns of four million jobless

    Public spending cuts would create a "double-quick, double-dip" recession and push unemployment over four million, the TUC's leader has warned.

    Brendan Barber called it "astonishing" that demands for reducing the budget deficit were being seen as a priority, rather than funding economic revival.

    Speaking ahead of the TUC Congress in Liverpool, Mr Barber said the outlook was "very precarious". But Gordon Brown says the economy is "on the road to recovery".

    The TUC's congress, which starts in Liverpool on Monday, will be the last one before the next general election and it comes at a time of strained relations between the unions and the government.

    'Tough choices'

    Mr Brown will deliver an upbeat message to delegates when he speaks on Tuesday, declaring "we are on the road to recovery", though he will say this will not be automatic and the recovery will need to be nurtured.

    Mr Brown will also say: "People's livelihoods and homes and savings are still hanging in the balance, and so today I say to you: don't put the recovery at risk. Brendan Barber says cuts would only promote recession

    The government says it wants to halve its budget deficit - expected to reach £175bn this year - within four years.
    Unions are alarmed at suggestions that this could mean slashing some areas of spending, possibly resulting in large-scale redundancies.

    Mr Barber, TUC general secretary since 2003, said: "Cut the stimulus off and the economy would go into decline again. Public spending cuts will provoke a double-quick, double-dip recession.

    "Unemployment could well exceed four million and it would take many years before there was any chance of returning to anything like full employment. That would scar for life a whole generation of young people."

    Meanwhile Liberal Democrat treasury spokesman Vince Cable called for the debate to move on, saying "big ticket areas" such as "defence commitments, public sector pensions and tax credits" needed to be examined.

    'Inevitable symptom'
    Mr Barber said deficits were an "inevitable symptom" of a recession, adding: "When the economy shrinks, governments need to spend more on benefits but get less tax income, and there has been a spectacular collapse in tax income in this recession."

    He told BBC One's Politics Show: "Our biggest problems are the recession and unemployment. That's what the government needs to be focusing on.

    "A time will come when we need to get the deficit down, but that's not the stage that we are at."
    Public spending looks set to be one of the biggest issues in the lead-up to the next general election.

    The Tories say the government is gathering too much debt, but Labour says the Conservatives would reduce funding for projects vital to restoring the economy's fortunes.

    The prime minister will tell the TUC congress that public sector jobs would be at greater risk under the Conservatives.

    Mr Barber said: "If a Conservative government was elected that was taking the axe to the public sector, that might well provoke a reaction. There would be that danger."

    Mr TUC general secretary has met Tory leader David Cameron twice in recent weeks but he said would not disclose what had been discussed.
  7. Ruud100 15 september 2009 23:53
    U.S. credit card defaults up, signal consumer stress
    Reuters

    NEW YORK (Reuters) – Bank of America Corp and Citigroup Inc customers defaulted on their credit card debts in August at the highest rates since the onset of the recession, a sign that the banks' consumer lending woes are far from over.

    The trend was echoed among most other major credit card issuers, dashing optimism sparked when many banks and specialty finance companies reported lower default rates for July.

    "People have gotten very bullish with the July data, and (the August data) raises the question about how fast the consumer will get better," said Scott Valentin, an analyst at FBR Capital Markets. "People were assuming the pace would be pretty rapid, and this maybe slows the pace down."

    The worse-than-expected August numbers bolstered the contention of some analysts that the July decline in defaults was due more to seasonal effects, like tax refunds, then an improvement in consumers' financial health.

    Many analysts expect bad-loan levels will keep rising until later this year or early 2010.

    "The defaults are a wake-up call for those expecting a V-shaped recovery," said Elliot Spar, options market strategist at Stifel Nicolaus & Co.

    Bank of America (BAC.N) said its charge off-rate -- loans the company does not expect to be repaid -- rose to 14.54 percent in August from 13.81 percent in July.

    Citigroup (C.N), the largest issuer of MasterCard-branded credit cards, said its charge-off rate rose to 12.14 percent in August from 10.03 percent in July.

    The charge-off rates for both Citi and Bank of America, two of the biggest recipients of U.S. government bailouts, were the highest yet during the financial crisis.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N), the largest issuer of Visa-branded credit cards, said its charge-off rate rose to 8.73 percent from 7.92 percent, while smaller Discover Financial Services (DFS.N) said its rate rose to 9.16 percent from 8.43 percent.

    American Express Co's (AXP.N) default rate fell to 8.5 percent from 8.9 percent as the company increased its lending portfolio.

    JPMorgan, Discover and Capital One Financial Corp (COF.N) reported late payments on credit cards -- an indicator of future defaults -- rose in August after several monthly declines.

    Valentin said the rise in delinquencies at some companies was double or triple the levels expected.

    NOT OUT OF THE WOODS YET

    Credit card defaults usually track unemployment, which rose to a 26-year high of 9.7 percent in August. The jobless rate is expected to peak at more than 10 percent by year-end.

    Considering the trend of unemployment and the increase in delinquencies, analysts have estimated credit card losses will keep rising in coming months.

    Yet analysts have a rosier outlook now than they did a few months ago, expecting credit-card defaults to bottom out at an average of 11 percent to 12 percent, below earlier estimates of up to 14 percent.

    As credit card losses rose to record highs in recent months, credit card companies closed millions of accounts, trimmed lending limits and slashed rewards.

    Lenders are also raising fees and interest rates ahead of a new law that increases protection for consumers. The law is expected to shrink the industry and limit subprime borrowers' access to plastic money.

    Also on Tuesday, MasterCard Inc (MA.N), the world's second-largest credit card network, said the volume of payments it processed in the United States declined less in July and August than in the second quarter, a sign that the payments industry may be stabilizing.
  8. Ruud100 16 september 2009 22:48

    “Is this the best way to spend money we don’t have?”

    Fight in Congress Looms on Tax Break for Home Buyers
    Mark Perlstein for The New York Times
    Published: September 15, 2009

    DALLAS — When Congress passed an $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers last winter, it was intended as a dose of shock therapy during a crisis. Now the question is becoming whether the housing market can function without it.

    As many as 40 percent of all home buyers this year will qualify for the credit. It is on track to cost the government $15 billion, more than twice the amount that was projected when Congress passed the stimulus bill in February.

    In the view of the real estate industry and some economists, all that money is well spent. They contend the credit is doing what it was meant to do, encouraging a recovery in the housing market that is gathering steam. Analysts say the credit is directly responsible for several hundred thousand home sales.

    Skeptics argue that most of the money is going to people who would have bought a home anyway. And they contend that unless it is allowed to expire on schedule in late November, the tax credit is likely to become one more expensive government program that refuses to die.

    The real estate industry, including the powerful 1.1 million-member National Association of Realtors, wants Congress to extend the credit at least through next summer. The group hopes to expand the program to $15,000 and to allow all buyers, not just those who have been out of the market for at least three years, to qualify. The price tag on that plan: $50 billion to $100 billion.

    Joseph and Chassity Myers are among the two million buyers eligible for the credit this year. The newlyweds heard they could get money from the government for something they were tempted to do anyway.

    “It was a no-brainer,” said Mr. Myers, a commercial underwriter. “Owning something is the American family dream.”

    The couple bought a two-bedroom condominium here in the spring for $171,000 and amended their 2008 taxes immediately, receiving their windfall by direct deposit a few weeks later.

    Their home is now a monument to the government’s generosity. They bought a leather couch, a kitchen table, a bed, television stand, china cabinet, kitchen table, coffee table, grill and patio set.

    “We did exactly what the government wanted us to do,” said Ms. Myers, a third grade teacher. “We stimulated the economy.”

    Mortgage applications increased nearly 10 percent for the week ending Sept. 3 from late August, the largest gain since early April and the latest of many signs of life in real estate. The upturn can be attributed to several factors: the return of confidence, very low mortgage rates, and prices in some markets that are at decade-low levels.

    But the looming expiration of the tax credit on Nov. 30 seems to be playing a role too, particularly in relatively low-cost markets like Phoenix, Las Vegas and Dallas.

    The 50-year-old complex that the Myerses live in, grandly named the Lawn at Bluffview, provides a snapshot of the credit’s influence — and limitations. Two years ago, the buildings were converted from apartments to condominiums by their owner, a local developer. In January, before the credit, only 30 of the 70 units had sold.

    Since then, another seven units have sold, including the one bought by the Myerses. Brian Denbow, who works for a subprime auto financing firm, also was spurred to action by the credit. He too intends to use the money for furniture. Five of the buyers did not qualify for the credit for various reasons.

    The Lawn at Bluffview remains nowhere near full. Potential buyers “just want a deal,” said the sales agent, Beverly Bell. Two weeks ago, the price of the unsold units was cut 10 percent.

    The National Association of Realtors estimates that about 350,000 sales this year would not have happened without the lure of the tax credit. Moody’s Economy.com used computer modeling to put the number at 400,000.

    The government’s efforts to directly reward home buyers began more than a year ago with a $7,500 tax credit that had to be repaid over 15 years. Last winter, amid fears of another Great Depression, the Senate came up with a much sweeter $15,000 package as part of the stimulus bill. That measure was ultimately reduced to the $8,000 credit.

    Now the sponsor of the original Senate bill, Johnny Isakson, Republican of Georgia, is back with a new bill that would give a maximum $15,000 credit to any buyer who stays in a home for at least two years.

    “The problem now is not first-time buyers, it’s the move-up market — the guy transferred from Chicago to Atlanta who can’t sell his house,” said Mr. Isakson, a former real estate agent.

    Without a new and more generous credit, he warned, there would be a downward spiral of home sales and more foreclosures, provoking a second recession.

    The real estate industry is lobbying heavily for the bill, but acknowledges that in an atmosphere that is less crisis-driven than last winter it will almost certainly have to settle for less.

    “There will be a lot of water under the bridge, a lot of compromise, between now” and a final bill, said Richard A. Smith, chairman of the Business Roundtable’s Housing Working Group.

    Economists are sharply split on the merits of another round of government help.

    Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Economy.com, favors expanding the credit to all home buyers, even investors, into next summer. “The risks of not doing something like this are too great,” he said. “I don’t think the coast is clear.”

    James Glassman of JPMorgan Chase echoed those views but said he favored continuing to restrict the credit to first-time buyers.

    On the other side of the issue is the Tax Policy Center, a joint venture of the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute. It labeled the original credit as one of the worst provisions of the stimulus package, on the grounds that the money is a bonus for people who would buy a house anyway. The center has an even dimmer view of extending the credit to all buyers.

    “Is this the best way to spend money we don’t have?” asked senior fellow Roberton Williams.

    Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research called the credit “a questionable redistributive policy” from renters to home buyers, but said that he used it himself when he bought a house.

    He wrote on his blog: “Thank you very much, suckers!”
  9. Ruud100 19 september 2009 00:17
    NHG op de amerikaanse manier. 3,5% van de koopsom...
    Voor het eerst in de historie zitten ze onder de minimaal benodigde reserves, maar ze zijn er zeker van dat ze niet door de overheid "gered" hoeven worden.

    Gr
    Ruud

    Housing Agency Reports a Shortfall in Reserves
    By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Published: September 18, 2009

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Housing Administration said Friday that its financial cushion would sink below mandatory levels for the first time in its history, but officials insisted the agency would not need to be rescued.

    “Under no circumstance will any taxpayer bailout be needed,” said David Stevens, the F.H.A.’s commissioner. He also said its borrowers were unlikely to see any change.

    Amid the collapse of the subprime lending market, the government has taken up the slack. The F.H.A. has insured nearly a quarter of all new loans made this year, and about 80 percent of that business is from first-time home buyers.

    But the agency has faced mounting concerns on Capitol Hill that it will soon need a taxpayer bailout. As of this summer, about 17 percent of F.H.A. borrowers were at least one payment behind or in foreclosure, compared with 13 percent for all loans, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

    Plummeting home prices, Mr. Stevens said, were the main reason its financial reserves are dwindling. While an earlier analysis had assumed prices would hit bottom this year, the agency now is assuming prices will fall through next spring.

    The agency itself does not make loans, but rather offers insurance against default. Many borrowers are willing to pay for the insurance because F.H.A. loans require down payments of only 3.5 percent of the purchase price.

    The F.H.A. now insures about 5.3 million mortgages, up from about 4 million three years ago.

    In an effort to weed out shady operators, it wants to require that participating lenders have a net worth of $1 million, up from the current requirement of $250,000, and undergo annual audits.

    Last month, F.H.A. banned the mortgage company Taylor, Bean & Whitaker from making any more federally insured loans after it failed to submit a required financial report, raising fraud concerns.
  10. Ruud100 19 september 2009 12:54
    August Joblessness Hit 10% in 14 States and D.C.
    By CATHERINE RAMPELL
    Published: September 18, 2009

    In 14 states and the District of Columbia at least a tenth of the work force was unemployed in August, according to a Bureau of Labor Statistics report released Friday.

    Even as some economic indicators in housing and elsewhere showed signs of improvement, jobless rates declined in 16 states from July to August. In every other state the portion of workers who could not find jobs stagnated or, in most places, grew.

    “We’re not really seeing recovery anywhere yet, and it’ll still be awhile before we see much of a difference,” said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. “The only positive news, probably going into next year, will be slower rates of decline, not job additions.”

    Michigan continued to have the country’s highest jobless rate, at a seasonally adjusted 15.2 percent, compared with a national rate of 9.7 percent. In the Detroit metropolitan area, the rate reached 17.3 percent.

    Generally, Western states had the weakest job markets, with Plains-state labor forces relatively more resilient. North Dakota, South Dakota and Nebraska all registered jobless rates of 5 percent or lower. Compared with places like California, unemployment has barely budged in these states over the last year.

    Nonfarm payroll jobs — calculated from a different government survey — declined in 42 states and the District of Columbia. Texas lost the most jobs from July to August of this year, with a net loss of 62,200 positions. It was followed by Michigan and Georgia.

    North Carolina, Montana and West Virginia registered the biggest month-over-month increases in nonfarm payrolls. Economists caution that because such monthly state payroll measures can be volatile, these increases may not indicate a turnaround.
  11. Ruud100 19 september 2009 13:59
    We staan er stukken beter voor. Aandelen gaan weer skyhigh.

    De FHA ziet de zon schijnen, maar op 1 van elke 7 hypotheken is minstens een maand niet afbetaald.
    Bij de FDIC raakt het geld op wat betekent dat de nog bestaande banken de pot weer moeten vullen. Maar aangezien vele daarvan inmiddels het water ook al aan de lippen staat zien die daar niet veel in.

    Vexing = to torment; trouble; distress; plague; worry: Lack of money vexes many.
    Had zelf geen idee wat het betekende dus ik zet het er maar bij.

    Gr
    Ruud

    The Bailout Bill Comes Due, Vexing Agencies
    Published: September 18, 2009

    A year ago, as the financial system was threatening to collapse, federal regulators offered all sorts of assistance to ward off catastrophe. The strategy worked, at least so far, but the bill is starting to come due.

    The Federal Housing Administration, which is supporting the housing market by insuring loans for millions of struggling buyers, said Friday that its cash reserves had fallen below 2 percent for the first time. Raising its insurance premiums would replenish the reserves, but could also hamper the housing recovery. Another unpleasant option: asking for a federal bailout.

    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, meanwhile, is running out of money to pay back the depositors of failed banks. Its chairwoman said Friday the agency might for the first time decide to borrow from the Treasury.

    quote:

    schreef:

    Taken together, the two developments indicate “the limits of the government’s ability to make all the bad stuff go away,” said the investment strategist Ed Yardeni.
    [/quote]

    During the housing boom, borrowers spurned the F.H.A. because it required them to fill out a few forms and come up with a down payment of 3 percent. The F.H.A. became a wallflower, its share of the market dwindling nearly to nothing.

    Now the subprime lenders are gone, and traditional banks are so reluctant to issue mortgages they demand large down payments. But the F.H.A., which works with thousands of lenders to guarantee repayment of mortgages loans, only requires a down payment of 3.5 percent.

    The agency’s share of the loan market has risen rapidly, to more than 20 percent. Some of those borrowers are losing their jobs and, as a result, their houses. The default rate on F.H.A. loans is rising.

    About 14.4 percent of the agency’s loans in the second quarter were at least one payment past due but short of foreclosure. That is twice the delinquency rate for top-quality or prime loans, at 6.4 percent.

    [quote=]
    The F.H.A. has become the government equivalent of Countrywide Financial, the hyper-aggressive private lender that crashed two years ago, Mr. Yardeni said. “If you lend money to people with a low probability of paying you back, you shouldn’t be surprised if they don’t,” he said.
    [/quote]

    F.H.A. officials said Friday that rumors swirling around its reserve fund were untrue.

    “There will be no taxpayer bailout, there will be no special appropriations, no legislation, no action requesting any additional funds whatsoever,” said David H. Stevens, the F.H.A.’s commissioner, in a conference call with reporters.

    Nevertheless, the agency is appointing its first chief risk officer since it was founded during the Great Depression, and is making several policy changes. These include raising requirements on F.H.A. lenders to make sure they have sufficient financial backing, and providing new guidelines on the independence of appraisers, who analyze the value of a home before a sale closes.

    At the F.D.I.C., the insurance fund fell to $10.4 billion at the end of the second quarter, the lowest level since the savings and loan crisis of the early 1990s.

    More than 90 banks have failed this year. Another two joined the list Friday. The two banks are subsidiaries of Irwin Financial Corporation. The F.D.I.C. estimated that the failures would cost its deposit insurance fund $850 million.

    Among the options for the F.D.I.C. to replenish its fund are levying a special fee on banks, tapping the Treasury or issuing its own debt, the F.D.I.C.’s chairwoman, Sheila C. Bair, said Friday. Banks are opposed to a fee, but Ms. Bair expressed little enthusiasm for borrowing from the Treasury.

    “There is a philosophical question about the Treasury credit line, whether that is there for losses we know we will have or whether it’s there for unexpected emergencies,” Ms. Bair said.

    Those losses are likely to keep rising into the indefinite future, said Lou Barnes, a Boulder, Colo., mortgage banker.
    [quote=]
    “Government life support is crucial, but the patient has an open artery and each new transfusion of blood is just running out onto the floor,” Mr. Barnes said.
  12. Ruud100 19 september 2009 15:18
    Amerika, het land van de onbegrensde mogelijkheden.

    En ze hebben weer wat nieuws. Wie dacht dat Subprime ellende was, hier is de overtreffende trap. Er bestaan nog "slimmere" hypotheken. Eentje waar je de eerste jaren niet aflost en ook maar een deel van de rente betaald. De rest? Die tellen we gewoon bij de hypotheek op.

    "Because the new monthly payments can be five or 10 times what borrowers are accustomed to paying, they "threaten a much greater hit to the consumer than the subprimes," Goddard said, referring to the mortgages often extended to less credit-worthy borrowers that fed the first wave of the financial crisis."

    Of we er blij mee moeten zijn?
    Lees zelf maar.

    Gr
    Ruud

    "Option" mortgages to explode, officials warn
    Reuters
    By Lisa Lambert Lisa Lambert Thu Sep 17, 7:49 pm ET

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The federal government and states are girding themselves for the next foreclosure crisis in the country's housing downturn: payment option adjustable rate mortgages that are beginning to reset.

    "Payment option ARMs are about to explode," Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller said after a Thursday meeting with members of President Barack Obama's administration to discuss ways to combat mortgage scams.
    "That's the next round of potential foreclosures in our country," he said.

    quote:

    schreef:

    Option-ARMs are now considered among the riskiest offered during the recent housing boom and have left many borrowers owing more than their homes are worth. These "underwater" mortgages have been a driving force behind rising defaults and mounting foreclosures.

    In Arizona, 128,000 of those mortgages will reset over the the next year and many have started to adjust this month, the state's attorney general, Terry Goddard, told Reuters after the meeting.

    "It's the other shoe," he said. "I can't say it's waiting to drop. It's dropping now."

    The mortgages differ from other ARMs by offering an option to pay only the interest each month or a low minimum payment that leads to a rising balance in the loan's principal.
    When the balance of the loan reaches a certain level or the mortgage hits a specific date, the borrower must begin making full payments to cover the new amount. The loan's interest rate also may have been fixed at a low level for the first few years with a so-called teaser rate, but then reset to a higher level.

    Because the new monthly payments can be five or 10 times what borrowers are accustomed to paying, they "threaten a much greater hit to the consumer than the subprimes," Goddard said, referring to the mortgages often extended to less credit-worthy borrowers that fed the first wave of the financial crisis.

    Miller said option-ARMs were discussed at Tuesday's meeting on mortgage scams, which brought state attorneys general from across the country together with U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Attorney General Eric Holder, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan, and Federal Trade Commission Chairman Jon Leibowitz.

    The mortgages tend to be "jumbo," or for significantly large amounts, Goddard said, making it even harder for borrowers to sidestep foreclosure. He said he expected to see an increase in scams as distressed homeowners become more desperate to refinance big debts.

    Goddard said his office is investigating hundreds of cases where companies have made fraudulent promises, and charged large fees, to mortgage defaulters.

    The U.S. housing market has suffered the worst downturn since the Great Depression, and its impact has rippled through the recession-hit economy.

    Some signs of stabilization emerged recently, with sales rising and home price declines moderating in many regions of the country. Home prices in some regions have risen.

    However, many economists say there is still a huge supply of unsold homes lingering on the market and that, coupled with a frenzy of more foreclosures ahead, should depress home prices for the rest of 2009.

    Real estate data firm RealtyTrac, in its August 2009 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report, said foreclosure filings -- default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions -- were reported on 358,471 U.S. properties during the month, a decrease of less than 1 percent from the previous month, but an increase of nearly 18 percent from the same month a year ago.

    The report said one in every 357 U.S. housing units received a foreclosure filing last month.
  13. Ruud100 19 september 2009 21:01
    Low expectations for new loan help program
    Real Estate Writer – Sat Sep 19, 11:35 am ET

    quote:

    schreef:

    Last month, the Obama administration launched a program to help homeowners with loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration. About 850,000 FHA borrowers are behind on their payments or in foreclosure, yet the program will assist just 45,000.
    [/quote]

    The effort targets homeowners who were ineligible for the government's other loan modification plans. But the decision not to rescue more FHA homeowners reflects the Obama administration's need to protect the financial health of the agency, and to set more realistic goals for helping borrowers as its other loan modification programs fall short.

    On Friday, the FHA said its financial reserves had sunk below mandatory levels for the first time in its 75-year history. While officials insist the agency won't require a taxpayer rescue, falling home prices, rising unemployment and shady lenders continue to drive up default rates.

    Nationwide, about 17 percent of FHA borrowers have missed at least one payment or in foreclosure, compared with 13 percent for all loans, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

    The FHA said it will raise the financial requirements for lenders and request annual audits, and it is cracking down on lenders suspected of fraud. But the agency's powers to modify more loans for distressed borrowers are being weakened by the poor economy.

    "Stretching too far, not only risks taxpayer funds and greater losses than we would otherwise have ... it also is not good for those homeowners," said Shaun Donovan, President Barack Obama's housing secretary.

    Lorrin Montag and his wife, Dianna, are fearful about their future. Their unemployment and disability benefits run out next year, and the couple's one-story manufactured home in Corona, Calif. is worth around $150,000, far short of their $280,000 FHA loan.

    Lorrin, 65, has been out of work for nearly a year, after a back injury forced him to retire from his job as a truck driver. Dianna, 61, was laid off from her job doing computer-aided design at a maker of manufactured homes.

    Their hopes were raised when she was brought back this summer to do some temporary work. But that ends this month.

    While it might make sense just to walk away from their home and rent, Montag said, "we want to be able to live here the rest of our lives."

    [quote=]
    But with defaults rising, the FHA could be forced to hike its fees or be rescued by taxpayers. "The FHA, if it explodes, could be another disaster," said Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo.

    When FHA borrowers can't pay their mortgages, the government takes the hit. The government is currently trying to sell 40,000 foreclosed properties backed by FHA loans around the country — about 10,000 more than the typical level before the recession started.

    In Detroit, the government is trying to get rid of almost 1,700 houses and is forced to compete with banks that have cut prices to near zero. Hundreds of modest single-story homes on small plots of land sell for $10,000 or less.
    Other loan modification programs focus on reducing the interest rate, but the FHA program takes a different approach. It sets aside up to 30 percent of the outstanding loan balance, interest free. If you have a $200,000 mortgage, you'll get charged interest on only $140,000, saving more than $300 a month, based on a mortgage rate of 5 percent.

    The homeowner is still on the hook for the full principal amount when the house is sold or the mortgage is refinanced.

    But there's a catch: Borrowers who spend more than 55 percent of their total pretax income on any recurring monthly debts including home and car loans and credit card debt are out of luck. Officials say the risk that these debt-burdened homeowners will fall behind again is simply too high.

    Around 16 million homeowners, or about a third of the 51 million Americans with a mortgage, have a debt load that high, according to Moody's Economy.com.
  14. Ruud100 20 september 2009 10:58
    The Financial Crisis and America’s Casino Culture
    Justin Lane for The New York Times
    Published: September 19, 2009

    Throughout the history of American commercial life, one cultural trait has tended to dominate:

    Americans are optimists, a people prone to seeing the glass as not merely half-full but rapidly expanding, and bearing liquid that might yet be turned into gold.

    This exuberant optimism has proven beneficial, emboldening risk-taking that has achieved innovation and wealth. It has prompted entrepreneurs to invest borrowed money in untested ideas that sometimes yield breakthroughs. It has encouraged ordinary people to accept debt in the name of accelerated gain — more comfortable homes, higher education, late-model cars.

    Yet in recent times this eagerness to augment the present by borrowing against a seemingly lucrative future has reached dangerous levels. Excessive optimism and its close relation — a reckless disregard of risk — are widely blamed for helping carry the United States into the worst financial panic since the Great Depression. Millions bought homes they could not afford, convinced that something good would happen before the bill came due. Financial institutions bet trillions in borrowed funds while leaving little in reserve, soothed by the collective assumption that real estate prices could never fall.

    In the first months of the contemporary financial disaster — as fear descended on financial markets and economists worried about a repeat of the Depression — some assumed that the United States was suffering the financial equivalent of 9/11. Life savings were sliced in half, millions of workers lost their jobs, and homeowners confronted foreclosure. Years of anticipating better days gave way to economic anxiety.

    In some quarters, the sense took hold that household wealth had been looted by Wall Street while the regulators sat mute. Financial institutions had been allowed to operate a casino, using mortgage-backed securities and derivatives as chips, collecting the profits while sticking the taxpayer with the eventual losses.

    The Great Depression so tormented Americans that it delivered the New Deal, a muscular collection of government programs whose hallmarks — unemployment insurance and Social Security — remain the primary components of the modern-day social safety net. The banking crises of the 1930s prompted the passage of the Glass-Steagall Act, which divided investment banks from deposit-taking banks to prevent rampant speculation with ordinary people’s savings, while instituting government guarantees on deposits. (Many economists believe the final repeal of Glass-Steagall in 1999 played a key role in the reckless investment that triggered the latest crisis.)

    In Washington, on Wall Street and on Main Street, many are aware that the era of lightly supervised markets was fabulously lucrative for those positioned to capture a piece. Financial services and real estate — nurtured by easy money — swelled into major sources of employment, while boosting stock portfolios for huge institutions and ordinary people alike. New York cemented itself as the global financial capital.

    quote:

    schreef:

    “There are a lot of complex emotions at work,” Mr. Rogoff said. “Certainly, we’re terrified of the crisis. On the other hand, the United States has been a big winner in the global financial arena, and why change the rules when you’re winning?”
    Such sentiments carried the day a decade ago, after the near-collapse of the giant hedge fund Long Term Capital Management, which had attracted billions of dollars with the story that its sophisticated computer models had tamed risk. Its failure held the potential to drag down many of its trading partners.

    Then, as now, some warned that the near-disaster was a harbinger of worse ahead, if reforms were not put in place that limited how much borrowed money could be employed. But Mr. Greenspan, joined by the Clinton administration Treasury Secretaries Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers, scotched proposals for new rules, arguing that they would stifle American strength.

    Even the mere consideration of regulations for derivatives ran the risk of prompting investors to take their money overseas “because of a perception that the American regulatory environment is inhospitable,” warned Mr. Summers, who is now a leading economic adviser to President Obama.

    So the question now is how many people have similarly changed their sense of what the American economy needs. Mostly, it is a matter of whether the country is still feeling lucky; whether the recent crisis will come to feel like an unavoidable toll on the highway to fortune, or whether something deeper has shifted in the American psyche, leaving us shaken in a lasting way.

    Peter S. Goodman, who writes about the economy for The Times, is the author of the new book, “Past Due: The End of Easy Money and the Renewal of the American Economy.” (Times Books).
  15. Ruud100 20 september 2009 15:55
    Is the Recent Rally Irrational Exuberance?
    Published: September 19, 2009

    THE stock market has been soaring. It may have gone too far, too fast.

    Gina Martin Adams, an equity strategist at Wells Fargo Securities, certainly thinks so. “I would definitely tread very lightly in stocks,” she said. At the moment, there appears to be enough momentum to keep propelling the rally forward until it “stumbles on some speed bumps,” she said, but she warned that stocks were no longer cheap, especially with the financial system and the economy still fragile.

    At some point, and probably fairly soon, she said, a host of fundamental problems would pull stocks back down to earth — but, of course, she could not say when. “There’s a difference between where the market will trade and where it should trade,” she said.

    Despite this grim backdrop, Laszlo Birinyi, president of Birinyi Associates, a stock market research firm in Westport, Conn., believes that we are in the early stages of a classic bull market that has plenty of room to run.

    “At any juncture during a bull market over the last 50 years you could point to economic problems,” he said. “The obvious problems aren’t the ones that I worry about.” In his view, the economic weakness has been documented so well that the market has already taken it into account. “The negatives are right in front of your nose,” he said. “The market is looking past it.”

    Where Mr. Birinyi emphasizes opportunities, however, others are focusing on the dangers. David A. Rosenberg, the former Merrill Lynch economist who is now with Gluskin Sheff and Associates in Toronto, did not expect so robust of a rally, and said that underlying structural weaknesses in the economy implied that the market was due for a big fall.

    “What happened was that the economy received a heavy dose of medication from Uncle Sam,” he said. “The reality is that no one has a clue as to what the economy really looks like because it’s been so dramatically sedated by the federal government.

    Mr. Rosenberg said we were experiencing “an impressive bear-market rally” — a short-term upturn in a “secular” bear market — that still had perhaps eight or nine years to run. He advised stock investors to take profits now. Energy commodities, he said, appeared to be a better value.

    Mrs. Adams shares this bearish long-term view, even if she believes the market may continue to move upward for a while. Among the many worrisome signs she sees are Treasury yields that remain low, especially considering the enormous supply of bonds the government is auctioning regularly to finance its yawning deficit. This suggests that deflation continues to be a big worry, she said. If we lurch into deflation — a downward price spiral — it could devastate the economy and the markets.

    THE Federal Reserve is steering a tricky course, attempting to stave off deflation by creating enormous quantities of money and holding its benchmark short-term rate near zero. At the same time, Fed policy makers say they are preparing to reverse themselves to head off inflation.

    Will they manage a “Goldilocks” strategy, just loose enough to keep the economy growing and nimble enough to head off inflation? Watch the 10-year Treasury yield closely, Mrs. Adams said. It’s now 3.47 percent. If it stays low, she says, it could be a sign that the economy and stock market are in real trouble.

    In the meantime, enjoy the rally.
  16. Ruud100 21 september 2009 23:42
    Moody's: Commercial real estate prices falling

    NEW YORK – Prices for commercial real estate suffered steep declines in July and the volume of transactions remained low, according to a report issued Monday by Moody's Investors Service.

    The Moody's/REAL Commercial Property Price Indices (CPPI) was down 5.1 percent from June after slipping just 1 percent the previous month.

    The index is now 30.8 percent below its year-ago level and 38.7 percent below its peak in October 2007.

    Transaction volume remains anemic as well. For the first seven months of the year, the market averaged about 375 sales per month, Moody's said. That compares to about 1,100 a month over the same time last year.

    Prices for apartments in the East fared better than in other regions, falling just 6 percent in the past year. Nationally, apartment prices tumbled 24.4 percent in the past year. Apartments in the South posted the steepest drop, at 44.2 percent.

    Florida apartments have also seen dramatic declines, with prices now 49.8 percent below their peak levels
  17. forum rang 7 Beperktedijkbewaking 22 september 2009 13:52
    Gut Ruud, je bent een echte doemdenker hè? Er is idd veel om je zorgen over te maken. Ik heb echt niet alle posts van je volledig nagelezen, de teneur snap ik.
    Toch kunnen dingen wonderlijk anders gaan. Delen de mensen in India of China je pessimisme?

    'NOT OUT OF THE WOODS YET", las ik in een van je citaten. Het deed me denken aan het beroemde gedicht van Robert Frost ("Stopping By Woods on a Snowy Evening"):

    "Whose woods these are I think I know.
    His house is in the village though;
    He will not see me stopping here
    To watch his woods fill up with snow.

    My little horse must think it queer
    To stop without a farmhouse near
    Between the woods and frozen lake
    The darkest evening of the year.

    He gives his harness bells a shake
    To ask if there is some mistake.
    The only other sound's the sweep
    Of easy wind and downy flake.

    The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
    But I have promises to keep,
    And miles to go before I sleep,
    And miles to go before I sleep."

    'Miles to go and promises to keep' is inmiddels een standaard uitdrukking in het engels geworden.
    Ik voor mij blijf ook liever niet meer staan op die duistere plek in het bos...
  18. Ruud100 22 september 2009 16:47
    U.S. mortgage delinquencies set record
    Reuters
    Mon Sep 21, 8:32 pm ET

    NEW YORK (Reuters) – High U.S. unemployment keeps pushing up the rate of mortgage delinquencies, which could in turn drive personal bankruptcies and home foreclosures, monthly data from the Equifax Inc (EFX.N) credit bureau showed on Monday.

    Among U.S. homeowners with mortgages, a record 7.58 percent were at least 30 days late on payments in August, up from 7.32 percent in July, according to the data obtained exclusively by Reuters.

    August marked the fourth consecutive monthly increase in delinquencies, and the report showed an accelerating pace. By comparison, 4.89 percent of mortgages were 30 days past due in August 2008, while in August 2007, the rate was 3.44 percent, Equifax data showed.

    The rate of subprime mortgage delinquencies now tops 41 percent, up from about 39 percent in each of the prior five months.

    The results, which correlate with consumer bankruptcy filings, suggest U.S. homeowners remain under financial stress despite signs of improving sentiment and fundamentals in the U.S. housing market.

    August bankruptcy filings were up 32 percent from a year earlier, compared with a 35 percent year-over-year increase in July.

    Still, while more Americans were late with mortgage payments, they are keeping up with other bills. The proportion of credit card accounts at least 60 days past due was down in August for the third straight month, while subprime card delinquencies also fell.

    That improvement in delinquency rates partly reflects risk-aversion among issuers, which have cut the number of cards by 82 million, or 19 percent, over the past year, while slashing credit limits by $721 billion, to about $3.6 trillion.

    The number of new cards being issued is down even more dramatically. In June, 2.6 million new cards were issued, compared with 4.7 million a year earlier.

    "The data from August further confirms that we're witnessing a dramatic change in consumer habits," said Dann Adams, president of Equifax's Consumer Information Solutions group.

    Total consumer debt is down more than $300 billion, or almost 3 percent, from its peak in September 2008, Adams said, while the savings rate is nearing 5 percent, "a level we haven't seen in years."
  19. Ruud100 24 september 2009 14:47
    Thursday, 24 September 2009 13:19 UK

    HBOS and RBS 'almost went under'

    Two UK banks almost collapsed in October last year, the governor of the Bank of England has revealed.

    HBOS - now part of Lloyds Banking Group - and RBS were within hours of going under, Mervyn King told BBC Two's The Love of Money programme.

    Just days after the near-collapse, the government launched a £37bn rescue package for banks, taking stakes in RBS and the merged Lloyds TSB and HBOS.

    The chancellor has called the situation "the worst faced in peace time".

    Mr King described how strains in the money markets came to a head on 6 October and 7 October last year.

    "Two of our major banks which had had difficulty in obtaining funding could raise money only for one week then only for one day, and then on that Monday and Tuesday it was not possible even for those two banks really to be confident they could get to the end of the day," Mr King said.

    He went on to describe the consequences if the banks had run out of liquidity.

    "Individuals would not have had access to the money in that bank. Their deposits would have been frozen," he said.

    David Soanes, managing director of UBS, was part of a group of city insiders brought together by then business minister Baroness Vadera to assist with the government's response.

    "We only really knew by about 7 o'clock at night, that we, that everyone was going to get through to the next day," he told the programme.

    The full interview with Mervyn King can be seen on The Love of Money, at 2100 BST on Thursday, 24 September, on BBC Two.
122 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Neem deel aan de discussie

Word nu gratis lid van Beursduivel.be

Al abonnee? Log in

Direct naar Forum

Zoek alfabetisch op forum

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
Forum # Topics # Posts
Aalberts 466 7.106
AB InBev 2 5.531
Abionyx Pharma 2 29
Ablynx 43 13.356
ABN AMRO 1.582 52.078
ABO-Group 1 23
Acacia Pharma 9 24.692
Accell Group 151 4.132
Accentis 2 267
Accsys Technologies 23 10.829
ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC 218 11.686
Ackermans & van Haaren 1 192
Adecco 1 1
ADMA Biologics 1 34
Adomos 1 126
AdUX 2 457
Adyen 14 17.804
Aedifica 3 925
Aegon 3.258 323.042
AFC Ajax 538 7.088
Affimed NV 2 6.305
ageas 5.844 109.901
Agfa-Gevaert 14 2.062
Ahold 3.538 74.349
Air France - KLM 1.025 35.265
AIRBUS 1 12
Airspray 511 1.258
Akka Technologies 1 18
AkzoNobel 467 13.049
Alfen 16 25.180
Allfunds Group 4 1.516
Almunda Professionals (vh Novisource) 651 4.251
Alpha Pro Tech 1 17
Alphabet Inc. 1 418
Altice 106 51.198
Alumexx ((Voorheen Phelix (voorheen Inverko)) 8.486 114.826
AM 228 684
Amarin Corporation 1 133
Amerikaanse aandelen 3.837 243.748
AMG 971 134.231
AMS 3 73
Amsterdam Commodities 305 6.744
AMT Holding 199 7.047
Anavex Life Sciences Corp 2 495
Antonov 22.632 153.605
Aperam 92 15.047
Apollo Alternative Assets 1 17
Apple 5 384
Arcadis 252 8.798
Arcelor Mittal 2.034 320.943
Archos 1 1
Arcona Property Fund 1 286
arGEN-X 17 10.350
Aroundtown SA 1 221
Arrowhead Research 5 9.750
Ascencio 1 28
ASIT biotech 2 697
ASMI 4.108 39.597
ASML 1.766 109.805
ASR Nederland 21 4.507
ATAI Life Sciences 1 7
Atenor Group 1 522
Athlon Group 121 176
Atrium European Real Estate 2 199
Auplata 1 55
Avantium 32 13.834
Axsome Therapeutics 1 177
Azelis Group 1 66
Azerion 7 3.447

Macro & Bedrijfsagenda

  1. 24 maart

    1. Samengestelde inkoopmanagersindex maart (Jap)
    2. Samengestelde inkoopmanagersindex maart (Fra)
    3. Samengestelde inkoopmanagersindex maart (Dld)
    4. Samengestelde inkoopmanagersindex maart (eur)
    5. Samengestelde inkoopmanagersindex maart (VK)
    6. Chicago Fed index februari (VS)
    7. Samengestelde inkoopmanagersindex maart (VS)
  2. 25 maart

    1. Ifo ondernemersvertrouwen maart (Dld)
    2. Case Shiller huizenprijzen januari (VS)
    3. Shell beleggersdag
de volitaliteit verwacht indicator betekend: Market moving event/hoge(re) volatiliteit verwacht